Pro-Abortioners Should be Aborted Themselves!

I've been scanning over an on-going debate over at Right Wing News.

Comments/Observations:

1) Pro-abortioners' "logic" is flawed & is inconsistent (no surprise here).
2) "mightysamurai" on 2004-12-02 @ 2025.07 is right on.
3) "Neaku" on 02 DEC @ 1810.54 just demonstrated how warped the typical liberal perspective is (and further proves s/he is a crackhead & should be immediately aborted).
4) "CMD" on 02 DEC @ 2037.39 just made an excellent point against Neaku's 02DEC @ 1810.54 comment.

Right now, I'm too aggravated by all this to comment further. I am going to add to this post. I'll go through that thread comment by comment and point out flaws. Also, get involved over there.

Crispy

P.S. Was just thinking (imagine that)... It is a funny behavior that we take part in. Both sides know they will not change the mind of the opposing side; however, we continue to argue.. Funny isn't it?

P.S.S. - Sorry about that mix up there, CD! I had a friend call me & start asking for directions while I was reading along. He was northeast when he should have been going northwest. I get confused with these high-tech blog comments when I don't have those nice little lines to follow down like on a newsgroup reader. :-P

UPDATE 04 DEC @ 1018: Comments in the making.

----

"poivoise" on 02DEC @ 0353.00: Excellent job at plagerism, first of all. Second, your shots against Texas (displaying your distain for Pres. Bush) are unfounded. Texas has some of the best medical institutions in the nation (as you will find out later on).

"H4x_Teh_left" @ 0417.31 is 100% accurate regarding how Medicare "pays" doctors. Medicare decides how much an operation is worth, and what Medicare/Medicaid pays is well under break even.

-These "partial birth abortions"... Who is to say that the baby is only let out so far in every case? I am sure there have been times (and it will probably increase) when the doctor fully removed the child (purposefully or accidently) and performed the murderous deed on the defenseless person. The universe progresses toward chaos, scientific fact. By allowing any degree of abortion we risk further degrading of our society. Nolan1286 (first comment posted) made an excellent point.

"B_ill" further re-iterates my above point in his 0948.04 post.

"firebird" @ 0956.11 made a good point about former Pres. Clinton's hypocracy in relation to approving Gun Control, followed by approving partial birth abortions and then raiding the Branch Dividians all in the name of saving the children.

"Christopher_Taylor" @ 1025.37 sees where these mercy child murders are leading. He offered up for consideration that the next step is the "mercy killing" of the very old and mentally ill.

"Pants_On_Fire" @ 1244.26: I don't know and am therefore inquiring, has it even been proven that some children "endure terrible pain, pain that wouldn't kill them but would make them suffer" at the time of birth? Something about that arguement doesn't add up for me.

"Neaku" @ 1324.25: So as long as things happen in small numbers, that makes it okay? Uhuh, I see. Hypocrite.

"Techie" @ 1328.18 brings some excellent personal experience to the table. He is living (thankfully) proof that you can't be icing kids.

"Neaku" @ 1422.14 still doesn't get it. The hospitals in the Netherlands are going to be flying kids around their country (and possibly to the continent of Europe) to determine if the child is clinically brain dead or not. "Techie" said he was FLOWN to Chicago after he was labeled as a 'tard. Also, what would stop doctors from murdering a child because he or she was retarded?

"zilly" @ 1525.28 stepped up to the table and just threw up all of her(?) ignorance. Killing criminals for a crime is 100% different from murdering a defensless human being simply because the carrier of that child is ignorant & selfish.

"jantonio" @ 1648.52 has the flu as well. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS NOTHING LIKE ABORTION. See above.

"Neaku" @ 1712.47 - "Odds are that many..." is an irrelavant statement. I also reference your 1324.25 post where you stated that the murders in the Netherlands were only 10 to the 18 million citizens of the Netherlands. Uho, Neaku posted himself into a corner. Let's see how he tries to escape now.

"Neaku" @ 1728.30 Fetus isn't a human being, huh? Merriam-Webster says it is a developing human. Uho for Neaku, again.

"poivoise" @ 1744.01 - "...Hundreths (of times as worse...)" 1) isn't a word and 2) hundredths is 1/100 of the whole amount. Cognitive gimp (though this is claimed to be a comment quoted from a reader of IMAO).

"alemus" @ 1846.33 - This dude's just a wildcat. I like him.

--

"ULookFunnyWhenURMad" @ 1937.12: Though your screen name is humorous, you are a person who has spent WAY too much time listening to the leftist psycho-babble in a sociology classroom and you've become a spineless jelly fish. Nature/Nuture my foot. People make a choice what they become. "Many people born gay don't live a gay life..." You're about as stupid as those people that believe Darwinism is true. If its true, why are there still monkeys?!! If you're logic were true, why don't they live a queer life? Don't they know they're gay? How can you prove that someone is born gay, paratard? I hereby nominate you for the "Darwin Award". As for proclaiming people guily before they commit a crime, what did the murdered child do that he or she is worthy of death, in your eyes? You sentenced the baby to death for a crime the human being did not commit. Ironic, isn't it? Jesus may still love you, but I think you should go buy a saddle, ULookFunnyWhenURMad. NEXT!

"ULookFunnyWhenURMad" @ 1940.55 (I guess he just wanted to make the comment counter go up.) You're first up for the pro-abortion abortions, followed closely by Neaku...

"Raposa" @ 1945.45 & 1947.52 is like a hound on a blood trail. Well done.

"ULook..." @ 2006.34: So you believe in reincarnation now. If that were real, then abortion wouldn't really matter, would it? ...Except for the fact that such an action might not put you (the child murderer) in a favorable seat for your next life.

"CMD" @ 2037.39: Uho, CMD has seen the man behind the curtain. What next ULook & Neaku?

"ULook" @ 2045.10 comes back with a great arguement: "Being alive has never constitued protection." But murder is illegal. "Animal and plant life in general can be killed on a whim without any legal persecution." Oh yeah, I forgot unborn children are sub-human mutations to you. Can I be there the day you tell your child that s/he isn't a person until s/he is born? Also (hypothetically speaking), I'm going to run around with a baseball bat (idea from here) and smack pregnant women in the stomach. I should only be charged for assault on the woman instead of murder of the child, right? You have also proved that evolution and Darwinism is not true. You are still around. No one ever asked when life begins. I want to know when little sub-human mutations graduate, in your book, to a full-fledged human beings. Stop saying fetal and fetus. They are people.

"CMD" @ 2050.10 scores another goal.

"mightysamurai" @ 2119.59 rips ULook a new one.

"ULook" @ 2206.02: Anyone else getting tired of pointing out his person's stupidity? Actually, if the ability to agonize of the child's death is a factor, the scale tips in favor of the mother, yes; HOWEVER, since we are a feel-good society, we need to protect the mother from herself. In time, she will begin to greive over the murder of her very own flesh and blood. The scale (in the big picture) tips in favor of the child's life. This is because there are people who are willing to adopt the one who is hated by its mother so much that she is willing to commit murder. Adoption: the solution always ignored by pro-abortionists.

"CMD" @ 2213.25: GOALLLLL!!

"ULook" @2226.18: If it isn't murder, what justifiable name are you going to try to give it? You're so mentally inept I don't know how you've lived this long. Parent's paycheck part - That logic is the same as yours, goofball.

"ULook" @ 2231.13: But the government is obligated to ensure that its citizens are protected and to provide to the common good, according to liberal thought. You lose.

"ULook" @ 2308.27: The same errie silence as heard in the Artic tundra. CMD scores again.

Note: "ULookFunnyWhenURMad" will from here on out be referred to as "?", since he is a void of intellect, or quite possibly, just a void.

"CMD" @ 2317.24: You could take that question down a very windy road about cloning, but we don't need to go there right now.

03 DEC 2004

"CavalierX" @ 0027.18: Good work at blowing the sub-human theory out of the water.

"CWScheinder" @ 0418.22: Yes, push it back to the state-level, where it should be, and take it out of the federal level. (Any relation to CoolWebSearch? *ques errie music*)

"zilly" 1314.13: Call 911! Zilly just overdosed on something & is seeing stuff!

"CWS..." @ 1320.23 is, in my opinion, ruining an excellent debate. Correct, federal government should not make a ruling on a such a matter. Something tells me your waving the No Fed. Gov't ruling flag because you don't like the current administration. I'm not sure, though; we'll see. Go away, please. You're scaring away the fish.

"zilly" @ 1322.07: I'm not sure what this intellectual heavyweight is referring to. So, I can't flame her (?) right off the bat.

Note: Someone needs to restock the pond. All the big fish seem to have died off. These guppies are boring.

"Christopher_Taylor" @1330.54: Though his motives are nice & fluffy, his logic here is about as reliable as a Windows operating system.

"CWS" @ 1345.35: In not so many words just said, "You hurt my feelings. I'm taking my toys out of the sand box and going home. I don't like you anymore." *snicker*

"CWS" @ 1434.10: Dude, I think the horse is dead now. Move on, man.

"Blackmon" @ 1502.53: That was my thinking too. But since I didn't know for a fact, I wasn't going to put it out there.

"Neaku" @ 1505.29: Illegal drugs: The chlorine of the gene pool. You're little cell argument makes no sense, again.

Note: Public schools get out around 1500, I believe. Coincidence?

"Neaku" @ 1514.15: Santa Clause isn't real either, cheif.

"Blackmon" bashes in "Neaku"'s head @ 1518.12-1529.38

"CWS" @ 1532.06: This guy's like a bad penny... He just keeps coming back. You're trying to argue apples with oranges. Someone get this man a punching bag.

"C_T" (Christopher_Taylor) @ 1535.35: Was doing alright until he brought up the twin thing.

"Neaku" @ 1557.10: An alliance forms. It shall be called "CNeakuT" hmm kinda sounds like "Iniquity" to me. Neaku is unwilling to accept the fact that the Titanic is sinking... even though the ship is perpendicular to the water now.

"Blackmon" @ 1607.40 spells out line by line what Neaku hasn't been able to grasp for the past day or so. Then makes a mistake an inquires about Neaku mental inabilities. (This should get good.)

"CWS" @ 1611.47: THERE IS NO SEPERATION OF CHURCH & STATE IN THE FOUNDING DOCUMENTS, PARATARD. The only madated "seperation" is that there cannot be a state-sanctioned religion. CWS is a liberal. I smelled him coming. "I have nothing further to add." - Thank you, Jesus!

"Blackmon" @ 1641.35-1615.30: Cleans house.

"Neaku" @ 1625.17: Erm, you haven't exactly put forth any concepts, genious. You've just been lying and babbling.

"Blackmon" @ 1627.11: K.O. against Neaku.

"Neaku" @ 1628.55: And so we're back to square one. @ 1704.14: Do you know dumb you look right now? YOU ARE THE ONE who's ignorance is shining brighter than the sun. And @ 1748.01: You need to shut up. I hope the rest of you are seeing straight through this person's idiotic ideas.

"Raposa" @ 1803.55: Uho, Raposa just brought it up. In Vitro Fertilization... I was waiting for it.

"Neaku" @ 1804.37: What you vote for/against is not proportional to your intelligence (in all cases).

04 DEC 2004

"C_T" @ 1231.28: Makes a good post to sum it all up. He also effectively destroyed any hope of the liberals of using any more of Margaret Sanger's stuff.

That was fun. Now I don't have to talk about abortion for a while!


Crispy